Our New Machine, Pandora
#3226
Posted 10 November 2007 - 12:59 PM
#3227
Posted 10 November 2007 - 01:08 PM
Second is the name, honestly, the craiginator? Are you guys trying to get me to take this system seriously? Why not get a name that shows you are serious? I'm not paying 400 dollars for a system with a name like that, sorry.
cue hilarious anglo-american humo(u)r misunderstandings/flame/lack of irony etc etc
#3228
Posted 10 November 2007 - 01:22 PM
The craiginator should have standards set up (if they aren't already) for all these things. To many newcomers testing the open source handheld market emulators can be very confusing and this should all be "dumbed down" as much as possible to encourage new users.
#3229
Posted 10 November 2007 - 01:24 PM
And I suppose it is only fair us Americans get to pay a larger sum than the Brits for electronics once or twice in our lifetimes. Even if it's not much more
Edited by Senor Quack, 10 November 2007 - 01:26 PM.
#3230
Posted 10 November 2007 - 01:49 PM
One thing I know a lot of people found frustrating with the gp2x was that all the emus had different quirks, the menus were different, the commands to pause, save state, etc. were different. Rom paths were usually different and confusing.
The craiginator should have standards set up (if they aren't already) for all these things. To many newcomers testing the open source handheld market emulators can be very confusing and this should all be "dumbed down" as much as possible to encourage new users.
We don't want to attract morons to our nice community do we?
No standards, really, let the dev decide what they thinks is best. It should be fun to develop for, so no restrictions, no guidelines.
#3231
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:00 PM
-God Ginrai
Edited by God Ginrai, 10 November 2007 - 02:01 PM.
#3232
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:04 PM
It doesn't need a keyboard. It doesn't need touchscreen.
But if it did, it would appear to a greater market rather than just gaming geeks. Greater market = more sold and more applications. Better for us, and better for Craigix
I'm part of that greater market - the reason I'm getting it is because it could accomplish the basic functions of a PDA or UMPC - it would be a perfect replacement for my dying laptop (of which I only used to VNC or SSH "-X" home to read e-mail, etc., or used its 8MB card to play a few games.)
#3233
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:09 PM
One thing I know a lot of people found frustrating with the gp2x was that all the emus had different quirks, the menus were different, the commands to pause, save state, etc. were different. Rom paths were usually different and confusing.
The craiginator should have standards set up (if they aren't already) for all these things. To many newcomers testing the open source handheld market emulators can be very confusing and this should all be "dumbed down" as much as possible to encourage new users.
I think you've got a point here, which is why I think that Craig should publish design guidelines, even maybe graphical interface elements for devs to base themselves on. With well defined and explained guidelines to give the final user a smooth and consistent experience, most of us would adhere to that, I think.
No standards, really, let the dev decide what they thinks is best. It should be fun to develop for, so no restrictions, no guidelines.
Surely we don't want to be told "Do this, not that!", but we often have only too much choice, and having official guidelines could help. Also, if you know that users are used to a certain button for a certain operation in 90% of all other programs, you'll surely want to adhere to that as much as possible.
Edited by A_SN, 10 November 2007 - 02:14 PM.
#3234
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:14 PM
Those emu's matching the above would then get a "Craiginator Community Seal of Approval"
#3235
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:14 PM
I am going to eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for months if that's what it takes to afford the Craiginator. But I don't think I'm going to have to do that.
And I suppose it is only fair us Americans get to pay a larger sum than the Brits for electronics once or twice in our lifetimes. Even if it's not much more
Why can`t the rest of you americans take this sort of attitude that Senor Quack has ?. As has been said, The FULL specs have not been revealed for this machine yet, But people (Mostly the americans on here) continue to moan about the price, When they don`t actually really know what they will be getting for their money. Just give the guys who are developing this machine a chance to reveal more details of the spec before wingeing about the price, Please.
Trooper
#3236
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:17 PM
Edited by jpic3yk, 10 November 2007 - 02:21 PM.
#3237
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:21 PM
#3238
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:26 PM
#3239
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:27 PM
There are two reasons I am not considering the craiginator. One is the outrageous price tag, something that I believe will keep the dev scene on this thing to a bare minimum. Second is the name, honestly, the craiginator? Are you guys trying to get me to take this system seriously? Why not get a name that shows you are serious?
Some people have no clue
#3240
Posted 10 November 2007 - 02:31 PM
I'm more than happy with my GP2X, so the craig-whatever isnt really on my wish-list atm.
Down the track, I wouldnt mind a bit more power, but all the extras of the craig-a-thingy just dont justify the outlay to me. Ideally, a GP2X compatible/like handheld with higher clock and maybe hardware 3D at similar pricing to the current models would suit me fine.
If I want more polished (or 3D) software, I'd forget open-source and stick with the PSP and DS.
If I want an full open-source computer Id buy the EeePC.


This topic is locked







